Kyle Kang vs Evan Bynoe Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 10 Jul at 06:40 PM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

K. Kang vs E. Bynoe

Kyle Kang
Kyle Kang

Flag USA USA

l
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
l
Evan Bynoe
Evan Bynoe

Flag USA USA

l
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

20
Age
26
-
Height
-
651
C. Rank
892
584
Best Rank
881
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Kang 1 - 0 Bynoe

They have played 2 sets in total, with Kyle Kang winning 2 and Evan Bynoe winning 0. The last match between Kyle Kang and Evan Bynoe was at the M15 San Diego, 10-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Kyle Kang getting the victory 6-4 6-4.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Kang1
Bynoe0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2M15 San Diego(07-10-25)

Hard
USA Flag
Kyle Kang
6
6
USA Flag
Evan Bynoe
4
4

K. Kang vs E. Bynoe H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
58.27% (81-58)Career Total W/L50.27% (92-91)
1Hard0
2Titles0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

K. Kang vs E. Bynoe Match Preview:

  • Could Kang's second serve be a game-changer? Kang has secured 45.16% of points on their second serve over the past six months, slightly surpassing Bynoe's 44.74%.
  • Examine return game effectiveness: Kang has achieved a 46.64% win rate on opponents' second serve points recently, while Bynoe has been slightly more successful with 47.96%.
  • When it comes to returning the first serve, Bynoe leads with 32.07% of points won compared to Kang's 31.6%.
  • Who performs best under pressure? Bynoe edges ahead, having saved 54.43% of breakpoints compared to Kang's 48.06% in recent times.
  • Performance trends: Over the past year, Kang has dominated with a 72.97% match win rate, overshadowing Bynoe's 54.1%.
  • Clay surface advantage: Both players excel on clay, with Kang winning 62% and Bynoe 60% of career matches on this surface.
  • Which player competes at a higher level? Recently, Kang's opponents have averaged a rank of 364.7, whereas Bynoe has faced higher-ranked players averaging 232.95.
  • Deciding set prowess: Kang wins 67% of deciding sets, demonstrating a stronger finish compared to Bynoe's 54% success rate in such situations.
  • Analyzing pivotal break point conversion, Kang has been more efficient at 45% versus Bynoe's 42% in recent matches.

Editorial Prediction (July 10, 2025, UTC):

Evaluating the recent performance indicators, Kang shows a slight advantage in several areas that could impact the match outcome significantly. A minuscule edge in second serve points and a superior rate of converting breakpoints highlight Kang's potential to seize crucial moments.

While Bynoe demonstrates stronger resilience under pressure with a higher breakpoint save percentage, Kang's overall higher match win rate during the past year suggests a formidable consistency.

Ultimately, although both players show strong performances on their preferred clay surface, Kang's superior record in final-set victories and match-winning consistency against arguably less competitive opponents paints a picture of resilience and prowess on decisive points.

Factoring in these elements, Kang appears to hold a slight advantage and is thus predicted to emerge victorious in the forthcoming encounter.

Kyle Kang vs Evan Bynoe Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

K. Kang vs E. Bynoe H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won8
3Aces (Total)0
2Total Double Faults2
1:32:11Average Match Time1:32:11
64% (38/59)1st Serve %75% (49/65)
74% (28/38)1st Serve Win %63% (31/49)
57% (12/21)2nd Serve Win %63% (10/16)
50% (2/4)Break Pts Won %0% (0/1)
37% (24/65)Return Points Win %32% (19/59)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Kang 50%, Bynoe 46%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kang 54%, Bynoe 48%.
Break Points Saved %: Kang 53%, Bynoe 57%.

K. Kang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardChicago Challenger - 04-08-2025

R1

LIBH. Habib
L
7-6(7) 6-3
HardM25 Edwardsville - 28-07-2025

F

GBRA. Mchugh
W
3-6 6-1 6-1

SF

USAA. Kim
W
4-6 6-4 6-3

QF

USAT. Zink
W
6-4 6-0

R2

USAN. Ponwith
W
6-2 6-1

E. Bynoe Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
I.hardM15 Tallahassee - 17-11-2025

R1

USAR. Ferrer
L
6-4 6-1
ClayM15 Orlando - 10-11-2025

R1

USAJ. Kennedy
L
6-3 7-6(5)
ClayM15 Orlando - 03-11-2025

R1

USAN. Johnston
L
6-3 7-5
I.hardM15 Trois-Rivieres - 27-10-2025

R2

USAB. Suarez
L
7-5 7-6(2)

R1

USAM. Thomson
W
6-1 7-6(7)
banner

K. Kang vs E. Bynoe Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
58.27% (81/58)YTD Win/Loss50.27% (92/91)
55.73% (180/143)Sets Win/Loss50.00% (205/205)
52.07% (1612/1484)Games Win/Loss50.30% (1920/1897)
60.00% (60/40)Hard Win/Loss46.24% (43/50)
61.76% (21/13)Clay Win/Loss59.09% (39/27)
0.00% (0/5)Indoor Hard W/L41.67% (10/14)
0.22Aces Per Game0.13
334Aces Total240
0.18Double Faults Per Game0.21
267Total Double Faults388
1:39:57Average Match Time1st Match
449.96Average Opponent Rank289.97
59% (5163/8766)1st Serve %62% (4226/6785)
67% (3470/5163)1st Serve Win %63% (2643/4226)
51% (1842/3603)2nd Serve Win %45% (1149/2559)
43% (397/929)Break Points Won % (Total)43% (272/628)
41% (3646/8864)Return Points Win %39% (2568/6512)
28.57% (4/10)Challenger W/L50.00% (2/2)
61.60% (77/48)Futures W/L50.28% (90/89)
58% (78/135)Best of 3 Sets Win %50% (89/179)
67% (2/3)Best of 5 Sets Win %100% (3/3)
50% (20/40)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)48% (21/44)
58% (25/43)Deciding Set Win %50% (21/42)
89% (70/62)1st Set Won, Won Match88% (93/82)
11% (70/8)1st Set Won, Lost Match11% (93/10)
28% (69/19)1st Set Lost, Won Match11% (90/10)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Munim
INDA. Venkataraman
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
NEDF. V. Donselaar
INDT. Ghildyal
W1
1.21
W2
3.84
Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDA. Lakshmanan
INDA. Mehra
W1
1.38
W2
2.76
Mon, 01 Dec, 08:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Kodancha
INDC. Warik
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
INDU. Kamboj
INDA. V. Duddupudi
W1
1.22
W2
3.74